28 Jul 2010
New START Treaty: a semi-enthusiastic “… yay.”
Sadly it seems like the Obama administration’s new standard war cry for policy is “Something is Better than Nothing!”
Speaking at the United States Institute of Peace in Washington, DC July 26, State Department officials could hardly contain their enthusiasm for the START arms reduction treaty with Russia, saying, “the United States is better off with this Treaty than without it.”
Strong words, Assistant Secretary Rose Gottemoeller, strong words.
She is right, of course, but considering many U.S. senators, who have yet to ratify the treaty, maintain serious doubts about it, you would expect a bit of a bolder sales pitch than “this washing machine probably won’t make your life worse.”
Nevermind that all but one commander of U.S. strategic nuclear command from 1981 to 2004 signed a letter to the Senate endorsing the treaty, Senate Republicans still love our nukes and hate the Ruskies.
Well, in this case they do actually have reason for suspicion.
According to a State Department report made public today, it’s not entirely clear Russia has complied with past arms reduction treaties.
The document says the U.S. government does not believe Russia is in compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention because it has not declared all its stockpiles nor destroyed those it has acknowledged, despite a 1997 plan to do so.
The report also says Russia may not be in compliance with the international convention banning biological weapons. Russia committed in 1992 to dismantle a secret biological weapons program it inherited from the Soviet Union. Although Russia has said it is in compliance, it has “not satisfactorily documented whether this program was terminated,” according to the report.




